Public Opinion Polling in Mid-Century British Literature: The Psychographic Turn (Oxford University Press, 2021)

Whereas modernist writers lauded the consecrated realm of subjective interiority, mid-century writers were engrossed by the materialization of the collective mind. The mid-century fascination with group thinking was fueled by the consecration of sociology within academia and the ubiquitous infiltration of public opinion research into a bevy of cultural and governmental institutions. As authors witnessed the materialization of the once-opaque realm of public consciousness for the first time, their writings imagined the potentiality of such technologies on the body politic. Polling opened a new horizon for mass politics. Olaf Stapledon’s poll-obsession, for instance, inspired a fictional utopia where a species might psychically tune into the cacophonous collective mind and, thus, construct a de-centralized utopian democracy. Elizabeth Bowen, performing her own public opinion work, found in wartime fiction a space to outline the importance of materiality as a metaphor for consciousness. Public Opinion Polling in Mid-Century British Literature: The Psychographic Turn traces the most crucial period of group psychology’s evolution — the mid-century — when a term originating in Victorian spiritualism transformed into a scientific praxis. The imbrication of British writers within a growing institutionalized public opinion infrastructure bolstered an aesthetic turn towards collectivity and an interest in the political ramifications of meta-psychological discourse. Whether writers feared the monopolization of polling by oppressive institutions or celebrated the amplification of everyday voices through the publication of public opinion research, writers at mid-century aestheticized new models of interiority as objectified, materialized, politicized, and even commodified. The Psychographic Turn utilizes extensive archival research to trace embeddedness of writers within public opinion institutions, providing a new explanation for the ‘material’ turn so often associated with interwar writing.


Mid-century women's writing: Disrupting the public/private divide (Manchester University Press, 2024)

The traditional narrative of the mid-century (1930s-60s) is that of a wave of expansion and constriction, with the swelling of economic and political freedoms for women in the 1930s, the cresting of women in the public sphere during the Second World War, and the resulting break as employment and political opportunities for women dwindled in the 1950s when men returned home from the front. But as the burgeoning field of interwar and mid-century women's writing has demonstrated, this narrative is in desperate need of re-examination. Mid-century women's writing: Disrupting the public/private divide aims to revivify studies of female writers, journalists, broadcasters, and public intellectuals living or working in Britain, or under British rule, during the mid-century while also complicating extant narratives about the divisions between domesticity and politics.